15 new grants awarded
Stephen McAuliffe will evaluate whether disturbance mitigation measures for European badgers are effective.
August 8, 2025
Fifteen research projects have been selected to receive a total of $711,309 in grants from Wild Animal Initiative this year.
Our Grants Program funds academic research on high-priority questions in wild animal welfare science. We select grantees based on how well their projects meet our selection criteria and address priority questions in the field of wild animal welfare science.
We offer three types of grants: large Challenge Grants for complex projects that address key research questions to accelerate progress in wild animal welfare science; mid-size Discovery Grants for projects that expand the evidence base of wild animal welfare by validating methods and applying them to new systems; and small Seed Grants for researchers to develop new ideas or build wild animal welfare questions into existing projects.
This grant cycle includes our first projects in Costa Rica, Italy, Serbia, and Tanzania, expanding our global reach to 24 countries.
Read on to learn about the projects we selected this year.
Challenge Grants
We believe that making meaningful progress in the field of wild animal welfare science will require interdisciplinary collaboration between ecology and animal welfare science. This year, projects awarded Challenge Grants were required to have at least one team member with a background in ecological science, and at least one project member with a background in animal welfare science.
Does DNA methylation reflect environmental and social adversity?
Daniel T. Blumstein, University of California, Los Angeles (United States)
$219,900
In humans, early cumulative adversity has demonstrable consequences for health, welfare, and longevity. The welfare consequences of early adversity in wild animals is less well understood, possibly reflecting insufficient measures for assessment. Using a recently validated approach to quantifying cumulative adversity in free-living yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer), this project will investigate the welfare effects of early cumulative adversity. It will look for associations between the adversity index and key behaviors that indicate general wariness (flight initiation distance, time allocated to vigilance while foraging, and the propensity to emit alarm calls while foraging), biomarkers that indicate physiological stress (fecal glucocorticoid levels, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios), and ultimately, two measures of aging (telomere length and DNA methylation). By quantifying these behavioral indices of wariness and the suite of biomarkers that culminate in telomeres and epigenetic state in pups throughout their first year and in older animals throughout their lives, the project will determine whether adverse environmental experiences have immediate and lasting effects on welfare.
Why we funded this project
This project will add welfare to the research portfolio of a long-running study system of a free-living mammal. It will contribute to understanding the validity of biological aging as a welfare indicator by pairing it with other indicators and a comprehensive dataset of the animals’ adverse early-life experiences.
Stranding: a blessing or a curse? Testing assumptions of fish welfare during habitat fragmentation
Laura Stein, University of Oklahoma (United States)
$136,365
Fragmentation of freshwater habitats due to drought and heatwaves poses significant risks to aquatic organisms, particularly small fish, who are often overlooked in animal welfare studies. While fragmentation is generally considered detrimental to fish welfare — leading to stress, reduced social interactions, and increased mortality — there is also potential for positive welfare effects, such as reduced predation pressure or temperature-induced metabolic benefits. This project will use threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as a model system to: 1) validate tests of fish welfare for use in the field (indicators include metabolic scope, cortisol release rate, attention bias, and behavioral expression), and 2) test the hypothesis that fish stranded in fragmented areas experience different welfare outcomes compared to those in connected river regions.
Why we funded this project
This project will integrate multiple welfare indicators to evaluate behavioral and physiological responses, contributing to a deeper understanding of how environmental fragmentation impacts individual fish welfare, and developing non-invasive field methods for use on small fish species. This project also supports a Wild Animal Initiative fellow, PhD candidate Rionach McCarthy, who has a strong interest in welfare.
Harnessing machine learning for the non-invasive assessment of wild fish welfare
Tom Pike, University of Lincoln (United Kingdom)
$81,927
Wild fish are facing unprecedented challenges from climate-change-induced alterations to natural environments and anthropogenic stressors. Yet assessing their welfare is extremely challenging. To address this, this project aims to develop an open-source aquatic camera system capable of automatically and non-invasively quantifying a suite of behavioural and cognitive welfare indicators. Behavioural indicators include the degree of physical closeness between individuals within a group, the spatial arrangement of subgroups, movement behaviour, and agonistic interactions. The project will examine variation in these indicators along an urban–rural gradient to a range of putative stressors, before validating them using “challenge” tests involving ecologically relevant experimental interventions (e.g., acoustic disturbances such as boat noise). The overarching objective is to develop an open-source toolkit that integrates commercially available hardware with custom-designed software, allowing the methods to be readily used by others to easily, cheaply, and repeatedly assess the welfare of wild fish.
Why we funded this project
This project will provide proof of concept for a novel approach to monitoring fish welfare at scale that is designed to be widely generalisable and translatable across species, habitats, and contexts. This project will improve current strategies for assessing the welfare of wild fish, most notably by avoiding the need for capture, handling, or restraint, and by being entirely non-invasive and non-disruptive.
Brandon Mak will investigate the welfare implications of Germany’s non-lethal pigeon population control strategies.
Discovery Grants
Remote welfare assessment in wildlife using stand-off Raman spectroscopy
Jose Gonzalez-Rodriguez and Teresa Romero, University of Lincoln (United Kingdom)
$55,519
To enhance the welfare of wild animals, it is crucial to continuously monitor biomarkers and other metrics that can indicate changes in their welfare. However, this presents the challenge of obtaining repeated measurements from individuals, which often involves capture, restraint, and/or handling — procedures that can have significant negative welfare impacts on free-living wild animals. This project aims to develop a stand-off Raman spectroscopy system as a non-invasive tool to assess hormonal levels in wild animals, which can be integrated into welfare assessments. The project also aims to validate under standardized and natural conditions how biomarkers of long-term stress relate to a range of stressors that may affect wild animal welfare. They will use a combination of socio-positive (e.g., play, grooming) and negative (e.g., aggression, screaming) behaviors, indices of social integration, behavioral indicators of anxiety (i.e., self-directed behaviors), and resting behavior, as well as physical indicators of welfare (body condition, instances of injury).
Why we funded this project
This project builds on a previous WAI-funded project, which validated the use of Raman spectroscopy as an efficient way of testing hormones in hair. It will test whether this method can be used to measure hair cortisol levels from a distance, potentially helping to make the use of this indicator more scalable for long-term monitoring in the field, and reducing the need for distressing or invasive methods for welfare assessment.
Assessing the impact of ectoparasites on nestling welfare: Validating behavioral and physiological indicators in Darwin’s finches
Sabine Tebbich, University of Vienna (Austria)
$42,000
Nestling finches are particularly vulnerable to blood-sucking ectoparasites because they lack the ability to preen, dust-bathe, or escape infested nests. Invasive parasites are especially detrimental to bird welfare because naïve hosts lack behavioral adaptations such as nest sanitation or preening, and hosts often suffer from exceptionally high parasite loads. This project aims to integrate behavioral (breathing rate and sleep duration) and physiological (haematocrit, baseline corticosterone, oxidative stress and telomere length) indicators to assess the welfare impact of the bloodsucking larvae of the avian vampire fly (Philornis downsi) on nestlings of Galápagos finches.
Why we funded this project
We appreciate the diversity of welfare indicators this project will bring to bear on an important threat to the welfare of juveniles (an especially abundant and neglected life stage) in this species. By examining correlations between these putative welfare indicators, the project will contribute to understanding their validity, both individually and as a combined index, with potential transferability to other species and research questions.
Examining mechanistic relationships between metabolic rates, wild bird welfare, and impacts of selective logging on eastern Himalayan birds
Akshay Bharadwaj, Indian Institute of Science (India)
$37,500
Animals must balance energy spent with energy consumed, and can only persist in habitats that allow for this balance. All warm-blooded animals have a Basic Survival Cost (BSC) required for basal metabolism and thermoregulation. This project aims to understand how basic survival costs (BSC) affect wild bird welfare in the Eastern Himalayas. Using a combination of thermal imaging, respirometry, and ambient-temperature humidity data, we will estimate BSC in free-living birds across habitat gradients. Subsequently, the project will relate the BSC to multiple welfare indicators, allowing a triangulation of a bird's lived experience. By linking energy metabolism with welfare outcomes, this work will provide a novel, mechanistic perspective on wild animal welfare in an understudied tropical system.
Why we funded this project
This project builds on previous WAI-funded research and will provide insight into the relationship between welfare and energy expenditure, a commonly measured ecological parameter. Better understanding this relationship could prove useful in anticipating the welfare impacts of ecological changes, such as selective logging (the direct priority of this study).
Validating welfare indicators in an arachnid and their relationship to leg loss, a common defense strategy
Ignacio Escalante, University of Illinois, Chicago (United States)
$29,946
This project will explore the welfare implications of leg loss, or “autotomy” — a common defensive strategy among animals. The project aims to validate welfare indicators within an understudied group of invertebrates, the Opiliones (Arachnida) in southwestern Costa Rica. Field and lab experiments will be used to test three potential behavioral welfare indicators: 1) movement patterns (approach vs. retreat), 2) speed, and 3) exploratory leg-tapping behaviors (count of leg taps) in response to positively and negatively valanced stimuli. These behaviors will be assessed when individuals are alone, in conspecific aggregations, and in barren versus complex housing. All experiments will include individuals with all legs and those with missing legs to assess how leg condition impacts welfare.
Why we funded this project
If validated, these behaviors will provide a novel set of welfare indicators in an arachnid, a group whose welfare has historically been neglected. The researchers’ previous work also shows that autotomy is very common in this taxon, so this project has the potential to help researchers understand the welfare of a very large number of individuals.
A quest for a non-lethal method to assess spiders’ welfare in the urban environment
Alessandra Costanzo, University of Milan (Italy)
$27,000
Urban areas are the fastest-growing habitat type worldwide, causing significant loss of other types of habitats and biodiversity declines, while also potentially reducing the welfare of some individual animals through sublethal stress. While urban wildlife research has mainly focused on charismatic species like birds and pollinators, less attention has been given to neglected taxa such as spiders. This pilot project aims to develop welfare indicators for the orb-weaver spider Araneus angulatus, a species commonly found in urban settings. Juveniles will be exposed to urban stressors such as non-lethal mosquito-repellent pesticides, elevated temperatures simulating the Urban Heat Island effect, and changes in food availability. Once they reach adulthood, the effects of these stressors on individuals will be assessed using physiological (biomarkers of oxidative stress, detoxification, neurotoxicity, and energy metabolism) and morphological (body size, mass, and fluctuating asymmetry) indicators, and behavioral endpoints (prey capture rates and web structure). By integrating these measures, the project aims to triangulate spider welfare across multiple domains and improve our understanding of how urban stressors affect individual well-being.
Why we funded this project
This project advances wild animal welfare science by introducing a multi-indicator framework for assessing welfare in an arachnid, a taxonomic group largely neglected in welfare research.
Effect of an invasive competitor on the welfare of a threatened fish in a soft-release program
Raf Freire, Charles Sturt University (Australia)
$20,200
Invasive fish are common in most freshwater systems, yet their impact on the welfare of resident fish is often ignored. Invasive fish species compete and displace small-bodied native fish in several ways, including by preventing access to refuge sites, preferred foods, breeding grounds, and other important resources. This project will assess the welfare of native fish placed in sites with and without invasive competitors. Welfare will be measured using a novel population-level judgement bias test developed in 2023 with prior Wild Animal Initiative support. Additional measures of welfare will include differences in telomere attrition and typical physical correlates of welfare in fish. In addition to revealing the impact of invasive fish on small-bodied fish welfare, this work will also promote greater consideration of the impact of animal translocation and release activities on wild animal welfare.
Why we funded this project
This project builds on previous work funded by WAI and has immediate potential to inform freshwater systems restoration strategies with a welfare perspective. We are also pleased to see high-quality and scalable behavioral welfare indicators being developed for fish, a group whose welfare has historically been neglected and especially challenging to study.
Nicola Koyama’s project will attempt to validate body posture as a novel marker of well-being in Barbary macaques.
Seed Grants
Between freedom and security, what makes a feral pigeon happier?
Brandon Mak, Technical University of Munich (Germany)
$10,900
Feral pigeons in Germany are subject to the Augsburg model of non-lethal population control, which involves attracting them to breed in dovecots where food and nest sites are provided, and their eggs exchanged with dummies. Others are captured and housed in aviaries under similar conditions. While aimed at reducing pigeon populations, providing food, and reducing exposure to predators, it’s possible that these measures may incidentally alleviate chronic stress in free-living individuals. This project investigates the welfare implications of Germany’s non-lethal population control strategies. This is done by comparing the stress profiles of feral pigeons living “wild” in the streets, free-living pigeons breeding and feeding in dovecots, and formerly free-living pigeons translocated into aviaries. Fieldwork will be conducted to weigh pigeons (body mass measurement), collect egg and feather samples from their nests (corticosterone concentrations), and observe their behavior (locomotion and aggression).
Why we funded this project
This project will contribute to our understanding of the potential welfare effects of (non-chemical) fertility control in pigeons, a leading candidate for near-term interventions to improve welfare in urban contexts. It will also provide some information on the validity of egg corticosterone as a non-invasive indicator of stress by measuring it alongside other more established methods (feather corticosterone, morphological and behavioural indicators) for a more robust welfare assessment.
An evaluation of effective disturbance mitigation measures for European badgers (Meles meles) occupying setts during forestry operations
Stephen McAuliffe, University of Brighton and Forest Research (United Kingdom)
$10,137
In order to avoid possible disturbance to European badgers (Meles meles), forestry guidance in England states that activities using heavy machinery should be prohibited within 20 meters of active badger setts. However, this commonly adopted mitigation measure has never been scientifically assessed. As a result, it relies on the untested assumption that noise and vibrations do not disturb badgers if a buffer zone of 20 meters is maintained between forestry operations and setts. This research aims to validate that the approved noise and vibration mitigation buffer distances intended to prevent disturbance from anthropogenic activities are effective. Observations of badger behavior will be made in woodland habitats, and fecal cortisol metabolites will be collected for analysis. If changes in behavior and increases in cortisol levels are not found following exposure to forestry noise and vibration greater than 20 meters away, robust evidence will be provided to validate that badger welfare is not being adversely impacted by legally sanctioned forestry activities.
Why we funded this project
This project will help us understand the welfare impacts of anthropogenic disturbance on a common species, and could lead to a very near-term intervention to mitigate them if the project results in a recommendation to increase buffer distances. We hope it will set a precedent for testing and improving animal welfare protection methods routinely advised and adopted by many land-based sectors such as forestry, utilities providers, construction and agriculture.
Swan Lake: Assessing the welfare of urban mute swans
Irena Uzelac, Animal Rescue Serbia (Serbia)
$10,000
This project investigates how human-provided food, environmental conditions, and injuries affect the welfare of mute swans (Cygnus olor) in urban Belgrade. The project will assess welfare using indicators such as body condition, visible deformities (e.g., angel wing), injury rates, and behavior patterns like foraging and aggression. By comparing sites with different levels of human feeding and variations in temperature, the project aims to understand how these factors shape swan health and behavior. Reproductive success and juvenile survival will also be monitored to evaluate long-term welfare outcomes. A mix of behavioral observation, environmental monitoring, and welfare scoring will be used, integrating both natural and anthropogenic stressors. The ultimate goal is to develop ecologically valid welfare indicators that reflect real-world challenges faced by urban wildlife.
Why we funded this project
This project will help address the question of how food from humans and urban environmental stressors affect the health and welfare of wild birds by applying practical welfare indicators in a free-living, urban population of mute swans. While this question has been longstanding, most research has been limited to narrower health (disease) or demographic impacts. We hope that this project will provide information on when and how anthropogenic food might be a welfare threat or opportunity.
Validation of non-invasive measures for life stage in wild octopuses and AI-Assisted Behavioral Analysis
Michaella Pereira Andrade, Federal University of ABC (Brazil)
$10,000
This project aims to develop non-invasive methods to assess the life stage and welfare of wild octopuses. The project will develop an innovative AI approach that automatically learns to recognize complex behaviors, such as body patterns and ventilation rates, directly from pre-recorded videos in the field. In addition, the project will develop a methodology to automatically measure the life stage of octopuses in pre-recorded videos based on our database and non-invasive in situ measurements of the distance between the octopuses’ eyes and eyeballs. The main goal is to correlate these metrics with different behavioral contexts to determine whether they can be used as reliable indicators of the animal’s affective state. In the long term, the project aims to create an automated tool that accelerates and improves behavioral data analysis, enabling large-scale studies of the welfare of wild octopuses.
Why we funded this project
This project extends a previous WAI-funded project and uses innovative approaches to analyzing behavioral data for welfare assessment.
Validating body posture as a novel marker of well-being in primates
Nicola Koyama, Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom)
$9,995
A few studies on nonhuman primates have found that a hunched posture is a response to social separation and physical inflammation, but research linking whole body posture and physiological measures of welfare is lacking. This project will combine established measures of affective valence (nasal temperature) and arousal (iris-pupil ratio) to validate body posture as a new measure of affective valence. Two months of video data will be collected and used for thermal imaging, behavioral, and postural analysis from groups of wild Barbary macaques, along with pilot data for comparison from non-human primate zoo animals. Ultimately, the project aims to share a new validated measure and conceptual framework that can be applied to a range of wild mammals.
Why we funded this project
This project will validate an indicator for assessing welfare that could be relevant across primates, and provide proof of concept for its application in the field.
Assessment of welfare impacts of parasites and pathogens on migratory flamingos among Salt Lakes of East Africa
Robert Modest Byamungu, Sokoine University of Agriculture (Tanzania)
$9,920
This project seeks to deepen understanding of flamingo migration among the Salt Lakes of East Africa by looking at the role of parasites and pathogens on the welfare of two flamingo species ― the greater flamingo and the lesser flamingo — using non-invasive methods. To achieve this, the project will establish two sites: an experimental site and a control site. At both sites, it will (i) estimate parasites and pathogens loads, (ii) assess stress behaviour, (iii) quantify stress physiology and, (iv) monitor food resources of flamingos. Welfare will be assessed through behaviors (e.g., body scratching and feathers plucking), as well as signs of stress (e.g., fecal cortisol levels). The project helps provide an understanding on how environmental pressures impact wild animals' quality of life.
Why we funded this project
Flamingos are a highly numerous species, so the findings of this project have the potential to help researchers understand the welfare of a large number of individuals. Migration of other group-living animals may also be influenced by welfare, so the results may also be translatable to other species.
