Grant review panels

Our review process

We match proposals with suitable reviewers based on what we identify as the most crucial questions raised by each project, and use reviewer feedback to arrive at final decisions about which projects to fund.

Our grant review panels consist of experts across relevant disciplines who evaluate projects proposed by our grant applicants and make recommendations for improvement. They consider project design, animal ethics, and how the project is likely to be received by the scientific community. We also engage reviewers on an ad hoc basis to provide additional insight on certain topics, especially for our Challenge Grants program. 

Reviewers consider:

  • The scientific validity of the project design and welfare metrics.

  • The project’s practical feasibility and cost effectiveness.

  • The project’s contribution to wild animal welfare science.

  • The ethical treatment of animals impacted by the project.

  • The likelihood of a project leading to publication.

Interested in being a reviewer? Learn more here.

Our technical reviewers

Heather Browning

Pablo Capilla-Lasheras

Pablo Capilla-Lasheras

Andrew Crump

Dave Daversa

Dave Daversa

Vittoria Elliott

Vittoria Elliott

Wasseem Emmam

Wasseem Emam

Katrina Loewy

Katrina Loewy

Alan McElligott

Alan McElligott

Allen Rutberg

Allen Rutberg

Isaac Schuman

Manrico Sebastiano


Our ethics reviewers

Ren Ryba

Ren Ryba

Bob Fischer

Bob Fischer

Miriam Zemanova

Miriam A. Zemanova