Library

Browse resources published by our research team.

In addition to full texts of our peer-reviewed articles, our library includes research digests that break down our peer-reviewed articles; in-depth reports that thoroughly examine a topic; commentaries that explain the significance of particular issues in wild animal welfare science; and short communications that briefly survey a field or topic.

Wild Animal Initiative adheres to Open Science TOP Guidelines. Read more here.

Luke Hecht, Jane Capozzelli, Nature restoration Jane Capozzelli Luke Hecht, Jane Capozzelli, Nature restoration Jane Capozzelli

What is the value of wild animal welfare for restoration ecology?

Jane F. Capozzelli, Luke Hecht, Samniqueka Halsey

Capozzelli, J. F., Hecht, L., & Halsey, S. (2020). What is the value of wild animal welfare for restoration ecology? Restoration Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13114

Authored by former Wild Animal Initiative Staff Researcher Jane Capozzelli, Wild Animal Initiative Science Director Luke Hecht, and Samniqueka Halsey, Assistant Professor in the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources at the University of Missouri, this paper was published in March 2020 in Restoration Ecology.

Abstract

The restoration community continues to discuss what constitutes good environmental stewardship. One area of tension is the extent to which the well-being of wild animals should inform restoration efforts. We discuss three ways that the perspective of wild animal welfare can augment restoration ecology: strengthening people's relationship with nature, reinforcing biotic integrity, and reducing mechanistic uncertainty. The animal welfare movement elevates sentient animals as stakeholders and explores how environmental context directly impacts the well-being of individuals. Viewing wild animals through this lens may encourage people to think and act with empathy and altruism. Second, we incorporate animal welfare into the concept of biotic integrity for ecological and ethical reasons. Restoring ecosystem processes may enhance animal welfare, and vice versa. Alternatively, there may be a trade-off between these factors, requiring local decision-makers to prioritize between restoring ecosystem function and promoting individuals' well-being. We conclude by discussing how welfare can impact population recovery, thereby adding insights about mechanisms underpinning restoration objectives. Ultimately, restoration ecologists and proponents of wild animal welfare could enjoy a productive union.

Read More