Research sense: Incorporating animals’ sensory capacities in animal care and study design

Co-authored by Wild Animal Initiative Strategy Director Mal Graham, this paper was published online in Laboratory Animals in December 2025.

Full text

Abstract

No systematic procedures exist to ensure that differences in animal sensory capacities are accounted for in experimental design and ethical review processes. This oversight can compromise both scientific validity and animal welfare. This review presents three practical methodologies to address this gap: incorporation of specialist expertise through consultation frameworks, voluntary certification schemes modeled on Open Science practices, and mandatory sensory capacity review integrated into existing ethics committee processes. We provide a concrete tool — a sensory modality survey — that can be implemented by institutional review committees to evaluate sensory considerations in research proposals systematically. These approaches align with the 3Rs principles by enhancing experimental refinement and potentially reducing animal use through improved study design.

Mal Graham

Mal is Strategy Director at Wild Animal Initiative. Mal completed their PhD in Engineering Mechanics at Virginia Tech, with research on the movement behaviors of jumping and gliding snakes. They studied physics and philosophy at the University of Oxford. Mal has also worked with animals in shelter, veterinary, farm, and zoo environments. They are located in Philadelphia.

mal.graham@wildanimalinitiative.org

Next
Next

Rehabilitating wild animal welfare: A focus on veterinary rescue and rehabilitation interventions