Meet our grantees
Wild Animal Initiative funds academic research on high-priority questions in wild animal welfare.
The goal of our grants program is to fund research that deepens scientific knowledge of the welfare of wild animals in order to better understand how to improve the welfare of as many wild animals as possible, regardless of what causes the threats to their well-being.
We showcase our grantees and their projects here and continuously update this page as new projects are added.
Examining mechanistic relationships between metabolic rates, wild bird welfare and impacts of selective logging on eastern Himalayan birds
Grantee: Akshay Bharadwaj
Institution: Indian Institute of Science
Project summary
Animals must balance energy spent with energy consumed, and can only persist in habitats that allow for this balance. All warm-blooded animals have a Basic Survival Cost (BSC) required for basal metabolism and thermoregulation. This project aims to understand how basic survival costs (BSC) affect wild bird welfare in the Eastern Himalayas. Using a combination of thermal imaging, respirometry, and ambient-temperature humidity data, we will estimate BSC in free-living birds across habitat gradients. Subsequently, the project will relate the BSC to multiple welfare indicators, allowing a triangulation of a bird's lived experience. By linking energy metabolism with welfare outcomes, this work will provide a novel, mechanistic perspective on wild animal welfare in an understudied tropical system.
Swan Lake: Assessing the welfare of urban mute swans
Grantee: Irena Uzelac
Institution: Animal Rescue Serbia
Project summary
This project investigates how human-provided food, environmental conditions, and injuries affect the welfare of mute swans in urban Belgrade. The project will assess welfare using indicators such as body condition, visible deformities, injury rates, and behavior patterns like foraging and aggression. By comparing sites with different levels of human feeding and variations in temperature, the project aims to understand how these factors shape swan health and behavior. Reproductive success and juvenile survival will also be monitored to evaluate long-term welfare outcomes. A mix of behavioral observation, environmental monitoring, and welfare scoring will be used, integrating both natural and anthropogenic stressors. The ultimate goal is to develop ecologically valid welfare indicators that reflect real-world challenges faced by urban wildlife.
Validating body posture as a novel marker of well-being in animals
Grantee: Nicola Koyama
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
A few studies on nonhuman primates have found that a hunched posture is a response to social separation and physical inflammation, but research linking whole body posture and physiological measures of welfare is lacking. This project will combine established measures of affective valence (nasal temperature) and arousal (iris-pupil ratio) to validate body posture as a new measure of affective valence. Two months of video data will be collected and used for thermal imaging, behavioral, and postural analysis from groups of wild Barbary macaques, along with pilot data for comparison from non-human primate zoo animals. Ultimately, the project aims to share a new validated measure and conceptual framework that can be applied to a range of wild mammals.
An evaluation of effective disturbance mitigation measures for European badgers (Meles meles) occupying setts during forestry operations
Grantee: Stephen McAuliffe
Institution: University of Brighton and Forest Research
Project summary
In order to avoid possible disturbance to European badgers, forestry guidance in England states that activities using heavy machinery should be prohibited within 20 meters of active badger setts. This research aims to validate that the approved noise and vibration mitigation buffer distances intended to prevent disturbance from anthropogenic activities are effective. Observations of badger behavior will be made in woodland habitats, and fecal cortisol metabolites will be collected for analysis. If changes in behavior and increases in cortisol levels are not found following exposure to forestry noise and vibration greater than 20 meters away, robust evidence will be provided to validate that badger welfare is not being adversely impacted by legally sanctioned forestry activities.
Assessment of welfare impacts of parasites and pathogens on migratory flamingos among Salt Lakes of East Africa
Grantee: Robert Modest Byamungu
Institution: Sokoine University of Agriculture
Project summary
This project will investigate the effects of parasites and pathogens on the welfare of two flamingo species ― the greater flamingo and the lesser flamingo — in the Salt Lakes of East Africa using non-invasive methods. To achieve this, the project will establish two sites: an experimental site and a control site. At both sites, it will (i) estimate parasites and pathogens loads, (ii) assess stress behaviour, (iii) quantify stress physiology and, (iv) monitor food resources of flamingos. Welfare will be assessed through behaviors (e.g., body scratching and feathers plucking), as well as signs of stress (e.g., fecal cortisol levels). The project helps provide an understanding on how environmental pressures impact wild animals' quality of life.
Validation of non-invasive measures for life stage in wild octopuses and AI-Assisted Behavioral Analysis
Grantee: Michaella Andrade
Institution: Federal University of ABC
Project summary
This project aims to develop non-invasive methods to assess the life stage and welfare of wild octopuses. The project will develop an AI approach that learns to recognize complex behaviors, such as body patterns and ventilation rates, in video footage. In addition, the project will develop a methodology to automatically measure the life stage of octopuses in videos and non-invasive in situ measurements of the distance between the octopuses’ eyes and eyeballs. The main goal is to correlate these metrics with different behavioral contexts to determine whether they can be used as reliable indicators of the animal’s affective state. In the long term, the project aims to create an automated tool that accelerates and improves behavioral data analysis.
Effect of an invasive competitor on the welfare of a threatened fish in a soft-release program
Grantee: Rafael Freire
Institutions: Charles Sturt University
Project summary
Invasive fish are common in most freshwater systems, yet their impact on the welfare of resident fish is often ignored. Invasive fish species compete and displace small-bodied native fish in several ways, including by preventing access to refuge sites, preferred foods, breeding grounds, and other important resources. This project will assess the welfare of native fish placed in sites with and without invasive competitors. Welfare will be measured using a novel population-level judgement bias test, differences in telomere attrition, and typical physical correlates of welfare in fish. In addition to revealing the impact of invasive fish on small-bodied fish welfare, this work will also promote greater consideration of the impact of animal translocation and release activities on wild animal welfare.
Between freedom and security, what makes a feral pigeon happier?
Grantee: Brandon Mak
Institution: Technical University of Munich
Project summary
Feral pigeons in Germany are subject to the Augsburg model of non-lethal population control, which involves attracting them to breed in dovecots where food and nest sites are provided, and their eggs exchanged with dummies. Others are captured and housed in aviaries under similar conditions. This project investigates the welfare implications of Germany’s non-lethal population control strategies. This is done by comparing the stress profiles of feral pigeons living “wild” in the streets, free-living pigeons breeding and feeding in dovecots, and formerly free-living pigeons translocated into aviaries. Fieldwork will be conducted to weigh pigeons (body mass measurement), collect egg and feather samples from their nests (corticosterone concentrations), and observe their behavior (locomotion and aggression).
Field testing a remote, non-invasive method to monitor wild animal welfare through salivary biomarkers
Grantee: Maristela Martins de Camargo
Institutions: Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas and FUSP
Project summary
Biological samples are necessary to establish baselines and benchmarks upon which welfare metrics can be developed, but collecting them is generally a stressful and invasive process. Our project aims to elevate the standard by which we collect wildlife samples by introducing a novel method of saliva collection that does not involve immobilizing — or even encountering — the animal being sampled. This project will isolate DNA/RNA from saliva samples of lowland tapirs to detect viruses, as well as health and welfare markers, exploring them within a comparison amongst two regions with varying levels of degradation and human-wildlife conflict and, we assume, associated variations in the welfare and health of wild animals.
Comparing the welfare of stocked triploid vs native diploid rainbow trout in California
Grantee: Andrew Sharo
Institution: University of California, Los Angeles
Project summary
Rainbow trout are commonly stocked for recreational fishing throughout the world, but because of their negative impacts on the environment, many state agencies now stock triploid rainbow trout, which are sterile. However, triploid rainbow trout are known to be more sensitive to water temperature and dissolved oxygen, which may impact their welfare in wild environments. This project will use a combination of physiological and behavioral indicators to compare the welfare of diploid and triploid rainbow trout. We will assess the welfare of rainbow trout in ponds across the Los Angeles metropolitan region using qualitative behavioral assessment, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, body condition, injury/disease presence, and the expression of stressor-related genes, either non-invasively or through sampling fish caught by recreational anglers.